What Can Postsecondary, State, and Philanthropic Leaders Do?
JFF’s North Star goal is that by 2033, 75 million Americans facing barriers to economic advancement will have quality jobs, which JFF defines as roles that provide workers with financial well-being, safe and respectful workplaces, growth and development opportunities, agency and voice, and structure and autonomy. But OBBB borrowing limits may curtail access to the postsecondary education and training people need to prepare for those jobs.
These changes will not only impact students and institutions; they could also have cascading effects that limit the ability of people, businesses, and communities across the country to achieve economic success. State policymakers and leaders of postsecondary institutions and philanthropic organizations should begin exploring creative and financially sustainable solutions that help learners earn credentials of value.
We believe that a promising option is the pay it forward model, which recycles tuition aid back to the institution while ensuring students’ payments are affordable. Under the pay it forward model, aid is provided to a student as either an outcomes-based loan or income share agreement, both of which tie the amount recipients must repay to their future earning levels. With pay it forward programs that are well designed and have strong borrower protections, only students who secure medium- and high-paying jobs have to make monthly payments, and their payments are used to provide aid to incoming students. This approach stretches limited dollars much further than scholarships or grants, and it gives educational institutions an incentive to ensure that their programs lead to high-wage jobs.
Although plenty of states and colleges and universities currently offer financing in the form of fixed-payment loans, only a handful offer outcomes-based options that include protections for people who work in low-wage jobs. The Income-Based Repayment loan from the Rhode Island Student Loan Authority (RISLA) is an example of the latter. Many states have agencies and quasi-public nonprofits like RISLA. All of these, with support from state legislators and other leaders, could develop new outcomes-based loan options.
Additionally, many private mission-driven student financing providers offer outcomes-based loans. College financial aid offices could include these programs and providers on preferred lender lists as part of their efforts to help students find good financing options.
Colleges and universities may also decide to provide outcomes-based loans themselves, and students may see attending a school that offers such financing programs as a better option than enrolling in an institution where private loans or paying out of pocket are the only ways to pay tuition. Purdue University’s Back a Boiler ISA program is a recent example of an institution offering financing with low-wage protections, and recent research suggests that the program successfully provided students with an affordable and accessible financing option that measurably improved completion rates.
Philanthropic organizations can also play a vital role in advancing these innovative options. They can provide funding to support meetings and events and communities of practice that bring together state officials and leaders of educational institutions that are exploring innovative financing for students. They can also provide initial grants or investment capital to launch pay it forward funds. And they can fund research to clarify how outcomes-based financing impacts students, so that more schools and states can adopt and scale best practices.