Skip to content
Two healthcare professionals, one in scrubs and one in a lab coat with a stethoscope, review notes on a clipboard while walking down a hallway.
Report/Research

Private Equity Job Quality Initiative

November 12, 2025

At a Glance

Adoption of job quality initiatives across private equity has been limited. However, nine leading-edge firms have implemented best practices that demonstrate the industry’s potential to drive economic advancement for millions of workers.

Practices & Centers

With more than 13 million people employed across the country, private equity (PE) is currently the second largest employer in the United States, second only to the federal government. In addition, it’s an industry sector that’s expected to nearly triple in global market size over the next 10 years. Given that scale of reach across the workforce, PE has the potential to have a significant impact on efforts to achieve Jobs for the Future’s North Star goal: By 2033, 75 million Americans facing barriers to economic advancement will work in quality jobs.

But while PE has a reputation for eliminating jobs, rather than creating or improving jobs, there’s a group of industry leaders with a growing appreciation for the role employees play in driving value creation at the companies in their portfolios, and they’re exploring a variety of approaches for embedding responsible talent management practices into each stage of the investment life cycle.

Two construction workers wearing safety vests and helmets are installing wooden boards on a roof framework with hammers.

In the spring of 2025, with generous support from The Families & Workers Fund, JFF launched the PE Job Quality Initiative to start a conversation among leading-edge private investment firms about the link between talent management and value creation. This effort expands on the perspectives JFF shared in two groundbreaking 2024 reports that highlighted private equity’s potential to generate millions of quality jobs and drive economic mobility at unprecedented scale. The initiative sought to dig deeper into specific strategies and practices being implemented at PE-backed businesses to generate and measure growth and financial returns through people-focused value-creation models in tandem with well-established cost-focused value-creation models.

Our goal was to explore what’s needed to expand adoption of these practices. We aimed to identify effective approaches that could be broadly implemented while finding ways to fulfill critical needs and overcome barriers that firms and employers might encounter as they pursue these initiatives.

Objectives

In partnership with CapEQ, a private-sector advisory firm with deep knowledge of and expertise in private equity, we aimed to achieve the following objectives:

  • Identify commonly used metrics for measuring job quality and return on investment (ROI) at companies within PE firms’ portfolios 
  • Determine what’s needed to build a robust business case for implementation of talent-focused value creation models, particularly for small and midsize businesses 
  • Identify tools and resources needed to promote greater uptake of initiatives focused on job quality and talent development 

Activities

The work was made up of two complementary engagements that occurred simultaneously and included nine private equity and debt management firms. Six firms participated in group discussions as part of a community of action, and representatives of five firms met with CapEQ researchers for deep-dive one-on-one interviews to explore data use in quality jobs initiatives. Two firms, including one that didn’t participate in either the community of action or the deep-dive discussions, agreed to be the subjects of profiles offering a more in-depth look at their operations and strategies.

JFF and CapEQ recruited firms based on our knowledge of their existing practices and their willingness to participate. 

PE Community of Action

Over the course of five months, six PE firms participated in facilitated group discussions to explore industry trends, successful approaches, and implementation challenges while engaging in a variety of peer learning activities.

Participating Firms:

  • Apis & Heritage
  • Blackstone
  • Building Industry Partners
  • Future of Work Partners
  • HCAP Partners
  • Worker Solutions

PE Data Deep Dive

Representatives of five PE firms met one-on-one with CapEQ researchers to engage in deep-dive discussions exploring quantitative and qualitative aspects of data practices, definitions, policies, outcomes, and approaches to measuring financial returns on practices that improve the quality of jobs.

Participating Firms:

  • Building Industry Partners
  • HCAP Partners
  • Jacmel Partners
  • Trident
  • Worker Solutions

Key Insights

Signature Initiatives

The talent management strategies being implemented at PE firms’ portfolio companies varies based on several factors. A firm’s investment theses, industry standards and benchmarks, and the physical location of the company may influence the specific practices or policies PE firms choose to pursue. Some firms assess companies’ existing practices, values, and job quality metrics during the sourcing and due diligence stages of the investment life cycle. Others—particularly firms with majority ownership of companies—may wait until after an acquisition is complete to conduct deeper analysis and make changes to C-suite leadership where needed to ensure that talent growth and development are embedded in the value creation strategy for the company. For the most part, the practices being implemented by the firms that participated in the Private Equity Job Quality Initiative fall into four strategic categories: total rewards, employee ownership, pathways to advancement, and worker voice.

Total Rewards

Partnering with portfolio company leadership and brokering agreements with preferred providers to develop comprehensive compensation and benefits packages with an array of attractive offerings, including transparent and equitable pay models, health care coverage, flexible scheduling options and generous paid leave, retirement savings plans, and access to emergency funds. 

Benefits to Workers: 

  • HCAP Partners saw increases in employee satisfaction ratings and client ratings, as well as reductions in turnover as part of an effort to enhance HR practices and improve benefits at its portfolio companies. Among other things, this effort has led to increased wages, expanded access to 401(k) plans with employer matches, and improved health care benefits for frontline workers. The firm also developed an industry leading employee assistance fund to provide financial support to workers experiencing unexpected economic hardships.
  • Building Industry Partners has increased HR capacity, enhanced paid time off policies, and expanded 401(k) options across its holdings, enhancing the businesses’ ability to attract and retain talent and making them more competitive within their respective markets.
  • Worker Solutions supported 6,061 workers in gaining access to improved workplace benefits.
Employee Ownership

Empowering employees to build personal wealth, take on shared accountability for company performance, and embrace ownership influence over company decision-making through the creation of employee stock ownership plans (ESOP) or other flexible stock option models.

Benefits to Workers:

  • Apis & Heritage has transferred more than $65 million to workers through ESOP conversions. It also offers customized training to encourage workers to embrace an ownership mindset. As a result, it has seen reductions in turnover and improvements in pay, benefits, and company performance at portfolio companies.
Pathways to Advancement

Implementing low-to-no-cost skills training initiatives that support worker advancement and economic mobility within a company or across an industry.

Benefits to Workers:

  • Marcus Felder, Managing Partner and Head of Career Pathways for Blackstone, says they’ve partnered with “more than 70 portfolio companies to create structured career pathways with on-the-job training and advancement opportunities for jobseekers who are members of populations that are historically untapped in quality jobs.”
Worker Voice

Empowering workers to feel a greater sense of ownership and autonomy in the company’s operations and an increased sense of responsibility in their individual roles by creating supportive environments in which they feel safe voicing their concerns and opinions and by providing tools they can use to share ideas for improvement or help co-create solutions to complex workplace challenges.

Benefits to Workers:

  • Future of Work Partners collaborated with PwC to design the Good Job Score assessment tool and deploy it across all Future of Work portfolio companies, aligning key performance indicators (KPI) commonly tracked by human resources executives with worker feedback and identifying opportunities for workplace improvements.

Measuring ROI

Two people in a warehouse discussing inventory; one holds a tablet while the other gestures toward shelves stacked with boxes and packages.

A key goal of the PE Job Quality Initiative was to better understand why measuring ROI of job-quality-related practices remains so difficult for PE firms. One factor is the wide variety of approaches and methods for defining metrics and gathering data across firms. Nearly all participating firms focus their investments exclusively on lower middle-market companies. Therefore, the findings below and in subsequent sections are assumed to be specific to the unique contexts and needs of small to midsize businesses.

Defining a Quality Job: The majority of PE firms that engaged in this effort have not adopted a formal definition or set of criteria for a quality job, and none currently have plans to do so. Some noted the importance of working collaboratively with their portfolio companies to envision desired goals and targets for improvements in job quality. However, several reported that they have explored models that identify the core characteristics of quality jobs—as JFF’s quality jobs initiative does—and have found that the definition varies based on factors such as the company’s location, the industry it’s in, and the nature of specific occupations. 

A black and blue icon of an award ribbon with a star in the center.

Best Practice:

HCAP Partners identified specific elements of quality jobs and used those findings to develop a framework for collaborating with its portfolio companies to design and implement initiatives that create quality jobs. Known as the Gainful Jobs Approach, the framework serves as the basis for efforts to improve job quality across six key attributes: Broad-Based Participation, Opportunities for Advancement, Sustainable Livelihood, Belonging, Paid Time Off, and Wellness Initiatives. The specificity of the Gainful Jobs Approach makes it possible to pinpoint key people-focused metrics that enable HCAP and its portfolio companies to measure improvements and impact over time.

Approaches to Measuring Impact: More than half of all portfolio companies held by the participating PE firms are small-to-midsize businesses, which makes robust ROI measurement challenging. Smaller employers often lack the HR capacity, data infrastructure, and data expertise required to calculate the ROI of their job quality practices—a process that’s difficult to begin with because it requires controlling for many external variables that can affect perceptions of job quality. Determining causal relationships between changes in talent management practices and increases in value or profitability is a daunting task. Participating PE firms that are measuring and reporting the impact of people-focused initiatives are taking the following approaches:

Capacity and Expertise
  • A few PE firms are fortunate to have dedicated staff with data expertise overseeing data collection and analysis for portfolio companies, but other firms don’t have that capacity and must assign portfolio company employees to take on those tasks in addition to their primary responsibilities.

A black and blue icon of an award ribbon with a star in the center.Best Practice: Building Industry Partners has made it a priority across all of its holdings to work with small and midsize businesses to implement HR software, improve data hygiene, and invest in staff expertise to enable more consistent and comprehensive data collection and analysis. Key data is reviewed at people-focused management discussion and analysis meetings that include both portfolio company and PE firm leaders.

Methods and Technologies
  • While most firms reported that they do have standard metrics and processes to support their data collection efforts at portfolio companies, their methods vary, primarily due to differences in resources and staff capabilities at portfolio companies.
  • Some firms use HR software and platforms such as HRBench or Finch, which connect to companies’ human resources information systems to support quick and consistent data collection. Other firms have used impact data platforms such as UpMetrics to visualize job quality data and review results with portfolio companies. When working with smaller companies where data technology resources and staff capacity are limited, firms may need to use lower-cost and easier-to-implement applications, such as Microsoft Excel and readily accessible survey tools like SurveyMonkey that are familiar to workers.

A black and blue icon of an award ribbon with a star in the center.Best Practice: In the fall of 2024, Blackstone began piloting its new tool, the Impact Measurement Framework, which is designed to help Blackstone’s portfolio companies pick and set metrics that align to their unique talent management goals and performance targets. These metrics translate into tangible ROI data that Blackstone portfolio companies can use in their skills-first hiring approaches.

Frequency and Quality
  • Data is collected at set intervals, typically quarterly or twice a year, in collaboration with HR leadership at portfolio companies and is shared with PE firm leadership.
  • Many PE firms said that it can be difficult to gather comprehensive and standardized sets of data across all of their portfolio companies because of differences in their industries, leadership dynamics, data capabilities, and locations. This makes cross-sector comparisons or aggregation of data challenging.
Communication and Use
  • In most cases, the PE firms don’t use worker-focused data to measure economic mobility, job satisfaction, or employee engagement. Rather, they use worker-focused data alongside several other data sets to assess the overall performance, health, and value of a company and to support workforce planning and decision-making.
  • Firms offered mixed responses when asked if they keep their worker-focused data only for internal use or also share it externally.
  • While many firms said they release annual impact reports, which may highlight the progress and achievements of people-focused initiatives, we found there’s a need for more data that’s been validated by independent third parties to lend objectivity and transparency to firms’ impact reports.

Metrics Being Measured: While the people-focused metrics that PE firms gather vary widely based on their specific investment theses and value creation strategies, all of the participating firms said they track the following data points, which serve as key indicators of job satisfaction, cost efficiency, and the overall health of companies:

  • New hires, departures, and terminationsA person wearing a red beanie and denim shirt checks inventory with a laptop in a warehouse, surrounded by shelves filled with boxes.
  • Employee turnover/retention 
  • Compensation and advancement
  • PTO use and absenteeism
  • Enrollment in available benefits
  • Pay equity 
  • Workplace safety incidents
  • Employee satisfaction or engagement, as measured using the Employee Net Promoter Score (eNPS)
  • Completion of skills training or professional development

Some firms are also collecting and analyzing qualitative metrics such as these, which they see as important drivers of employee satisfaction and retention:

  • Access to communal spaces within the workplace 
  • Worker commute times and transportation methods 
  • Frequency, format, and effectiveness of companywide communications 

Keys to Success

Given the wide variety of approaches and perspectives represented in this initiative, our conversations revealed numerous beliefs, practices, and strategies that could help other PE firms implement targeted talent management practices to increase returns for investors. We broke the Keys to Success into two categories: Those that support efforts to increase buy-in and adoption and those that could help scale implementation and measure impact.  

Keys to Greater Buy-In and Adoption (for both PE Firms and Portfolio Companies)

Buy-in expands when job quality is a core tenet of a company’s value creation strategy.

Prioritizing policies and practices designed to improve jobs generates firm-level buy-in and appeals to general partners and limited partners by directly connecting responsible talent practices to returns those investments generate.

Communication campaigns and strategic initiatives shouldn’t be one-size-fits-all.

Key messaging focused on promoting job quality practices should be tailored to the unique priorities of the various stakeholders engaged across the entire investment life cycle.

C-suite commitment is essential.

The full support of a company’s executive leadership team ensures that people-focused values will be prioritized alongside operational values as part of a company’s culture and foundational ways of working.

Frameworks, values, and principles are important, but rigid definitions are not.

Using a standard but adaptable set of guideposts to drive efforts makes it easier for leaders of portfolio companies to co-create goals and approaches alongside private equity professionals.

Establishing worker voice channels pays off.

When employees have opportunities to share feedback and suggest solutions to challenges, they can gain a stronger sense of ownership in the company’s success, and they may offer qualitative insights that put statistical data into a more human context.

Language and attitudes can make or break a job quality initiative.

All stakeholders should remain cognizant of the language they use and the opinions they convey when they talk about the need to improve job quality. They should choose their words carefully, so they don’t sound as though they’re blaming or casting judgment on others, which could make them appear elitist and sow division between PE firms, companies, and workers.

Keys to Increased Implementation and ROI Measurement

Embed job quality considerations into the conversation early.

Introducing the idea that job quality is key to value creation during the deal sourcing and due diligence stages of the investment life cycle helps establish priorities and expectations from the outset.

Use technology.

Tools such as HRBench staff analytics and engagement software or the UpMetrics impact measurement platform make it easier to collect, standardize, and analyze ROI indicators across multiple investments.

A black and blue icon of an award ribbon with a star in the center.Best Practice: Future of Work Partners uses HRBench to administer its Good Jobs Score assessment tool, enabling a consistent and standardized delivery mechanism that streamlines data collection and analysis across a variety of investments.  

Take a flexible approach to meeting companies’ needs.

While seeking opportunities for early wins to show that they’re committed to helping portfolio companies succeed, PE firms must tailor their approaches to each company’s unique circumstances, acknowledging that every organization faces its own industry-specific challenges and may have limited resources and expertise in areas such as IT and HR.

A black and blue icon of an award ribbon with a star in the center.Best Practice: HCAP Partners works with portfolio companies to create a Gainful Jobs Approach Strategic Road Map as a condition of investment close. The roadmap includes annual job quality goals that guide job quality initiatives and is reflective of each individual portfolio company’s context and needs. The road map is a key engagement tool that HCAP reviews quarterly with company management and updates to reflect progress and company priorities.

Use adaptable tools, templates, and playbooks.

It’s important for PE firms to use resources that support efficient and consistent implementation of practices across portfolio companies while also allowing them to adjust their approaches as needed.

A black and blue icon of an award ribbon with a star in the center.Best Practice: Building Industry Partners sourced a common technology stack for its portfolio companies to use to help reduce software costs and ensure that key metrics were being defined and calculated consistently across all of its holdings.

Don’t forget the supply chain.

Extending job quality priorities and initiatives to partners in a company’s supply chain magnifies impact and promotes broader regional economic development. 

Engage local and national workforce partners.

Workforce development organizations can be valuable partners who can inform and support implementation of job quality initiatives. 

Shared Challenges

Across community of action conversations and the data deep-dive interviews, the factors described below were repeatedly identified as challenges or barriers firms encounter when seeking to measure the impacts of their investments in job quality practices:

Outdated, siloed, or minimal HR operations.

Lack of sufficient HR expertise and resources makes it difficult for company leaders to implement policies and practices designed to improve job quality, share messaging about these policies and practices, or collect and analyze data illustrating the impact of job quality initiatives. 

Short hold periods.

Job quality initiatives can take a significant amount of time to design and implement and years longer to generate returns, so private equity firms that sell portfolio companies within a short period of time after the initial investment have limited ability to demonstrate the financial impacts of those initiatives. 

Lack of sophisticated data collection and analysis models.

Small and midsize businesses generally don’t have the data frameworks or systems necessary to conclusively demonstrate that talent-focused value creation strategies achieve higher returns than cost-focused strategies. 

Lack of consistency in the size of ownership stakes.

PE firms may have limited ability to implement new policies or promote cultural changes at portfolio companies in which they have smaller investments.

Capacity limitations at PE firms.

Despite public perception that all PE firms have an abundance of resources, many smaller firms have limited capacity to invest in tools, technologies, and people to support these initiatives because, as lean operations, they must focus primarily on deal flow.

Mobilizing the Field

Profiles


Profile feature on LLR Partners, highlighting customer satisfaction and job quality in the tech sector, with a portrait of David Reuter, Partner. Jobs for the Future logo at top left.
Click to view or download

A business profile for Jacmel Partners featuring a photo of founder Nick Jean-Baptiste, the company logo, and a headline highlighting a talent-focused value creation approach.
Click to view or download

 

What Comes Next?

Participants in our community of action and deep-dive discussions had several suggestions about how future efforts to spur conversations about job quality among PE firms should be structured and what their goals should be. Among other things, they offered ideas for encouraging deeper industry engagement in job quality initiatives and addressing key needs in order to broaden adoption of these practices among PE firms.

 

Deepening Industry Engagement:

  • Engagements should be co-designed with PE leaders. They should include stakeholders who are involved in all phases of the investment life cycle, and their primary audiences should be limited partners and members of the deals teams that are responsible sourcing, evaluating, structuring, and closing investment opportunities on behalf of PE firms.
  • Conversations should explore strategies for scaling peer learning, mentorship, and recognition programs, which can build momentum and help staff develop leadership skills.
  • Engagements could include PR campaigns that bring attention to job quality efforts in a way that motivates new firms to join the movement.
  • Efforts should explore ways to enable measurement of ROI by addressing the need for greater data capacity and expertise at PE firms and portfolio companies.

Enabling Broader Adoption of Practices:

  • Build a more conclusive evidence base through reliable data infrastructure, disaggregated metrics, and third-party validation
  • Explore avenues for small and midsize businesses to access capital, financing, and incentives that support adoption of more robust talent management practices
  • Develop grassroots and entry-point models for smaller PE firms or first-time adopters to design and launch scalable job quality initiatives
  • Develop playbooks and narrative frameworks that help key stakeholders communicate the value of talent-focused value creation models

How Might We . . .

A store employee shows a product box to a customer in an electronics store, with televisions displayed on the wall in the background.

The deep-dive and community of action conversations revealed that, while many private investment firms are doing well financially while also taking steps to do right by the employees of their portfolio companies, their commitments to improving job quality are primarily driven by the personal values and philosophical beliefs of executives in their C-suites, not by conclusive evidence that job quality practices lead to better business outcomes. The leaders of PE firms have ingrained job quality priorities into their company cultures and into operating models designed to promote business growth through thriving workforces and encourage sustainability through responsible exit processes.

The firms featured here are powerful examples of the potential for PE to be a key driver of economic mobility while also achieving investor expectations for growth and valuation. However, there are still several key questions that must be addressed before private equity can scale practices that promote economic advancement for workers industrywide:

How might we . . .

  • Design a robust ROI data framework capable of providing evidence that determines whether firms can generate higher returns by implementing job quality initiatives than they would see if they didn’t implement them?
  • Support the efforts of small and midsize businesses and PE firms to acquire the data infrastructure and expertise needed to effectively measure impact and ROI?
  • Expand access to capital, financing, or other resources that make it easier for small and midsize businesses to cover the upfront costs of implementing job quality practices?
  • Engage key stakeholders across the entire investment life cycle in a way that promotes transparency, vision alignment, and collaborative design?

Future innovation and progress will require PE firms to make a deeper commitment to being rigorous, focused, and intentional in their efforts to not only implement impactful strategies but also measure their outcomes in ways that demonstrate the link between talent management practices and investment returns. Coordinating efforts alongside researchers, community partners, philanthropy, and business and industry advisors could provide the spark needed to ignite a broader movement that enables private equity to transform the lives of the millions of Americans facing challenges in their efforts to build wealth and get ahead in today’s economy.

Stay Connected

Firms interested in continuing the work of advancing job quality across their portfolios, please contact CapEQ: info@capeqimpact.com

Available for Download

Key Insights and Initiatives
Click to download a brief that summarizes PE firms’ signature initiatives, keys to success, and shared implementation challenges as well as our proposed next steps based on our findings.
Jobs for the Future (JFF) is a national nonprofit that drives transformation of the U.S. education and workforce systems to achieve equitable economic advancement for all.